Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Clement Chidekh vs Pedro Araujo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chidekh vs Araujo analysis and find out who is favored!
Clement Chidekh vs Pedro Araujo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chidekh 1 - 0 Araujo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chidekh has won 50.95% of points on their second serve, while Araujo has won 49.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chidekh, in recent form, has won 56.88% of their opponent's second serve points, while Araujo has won 54.31%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35% and 35.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chidekh has saved 59.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Araujo has saved 56.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chidekh has won 68.75% of matches played (W/L 44/ 20), with Araujo winning 50.85% (W/L 30/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chidekh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 60/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7). Araujo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 84/ 82), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Chidekh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 25/ 10), where as Araujo has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chidekh winning 1 times and Araujo being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Chidekh winning 2 and Araujo winning 1. The last match between Chidekh and Araujo was at the M25 Idanha-a-Nova, 21-07-2021, First, Hard with Clement Chidekh getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chidekh and Araujo have played a deciding set 1 times, with Chidekh winning 1 times and Araujo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chidekh winning 0, and Araujo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chidekh has played against opponents with an average rank of 282.11 while Araujo has played against players with an average rank of 235.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chidekh has won 77% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Araujo has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chidekh has converted 50.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Araujo has converted 46.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
280
Rank
265
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
639
Rank
534
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
68% (117-54)
Career Total W/L
47% (103-118)
74% (34-12)
YTD W/L
61% (20-13)
$6,035
Career Prize Money
$2,870
3
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Clement Chidekh | Pedro Araujo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:0 | 1:45:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (50/73) | 65% (53/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (37/50) | 58% (31/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (14/23) | 48% (14/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (37/82) | 30% (22/73) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Clement Chidekh
Player
Pedro Araujo
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Clement Chidekh | Pedro Araujo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 74% (34/12) | 61% (20/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (70/38) | 57% (43/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (546/439) | 52% (352/327) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (20/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 82% (27/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 105 | 18 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 136 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:1 | 1:43:17 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 289.67 | 199.06 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1898/3111) | 70% (1531/2201) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1291/1898) | 61% (931/1531) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (618/1213) | 49% (331/670) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (179/357) | 47% (105/224) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1390/3181) | 43% (866/2029) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 78% (18/5) | 0% (0/4) |
| Futures W/L | 76% (16/5) | 71% (20/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (33/45) | 61% (20/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 86% (6/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 82% (14/17) | 67% (6/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 97% (29/28) | 94% (17/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 3% (29/1) | 6% (17/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 35% (17/6) | 25% (16/4) |
Clement Chidekh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Chidekh
41%
(
17 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Clement Chidekh
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Anas Bennour Dit Sahli
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
69)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
14
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
87
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Clement Chidekh
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Damm
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
5
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
8
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Robert Strombachs
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
0-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Tomasz Berkieta
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Clement Chidekh
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fausto Tabacco
Player
Clement Chidekh
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Clement Chidekh
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Pedro Araujo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Pedro Araujo
Player
Jesse Flores
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pedro Araujo
Player
Diogo Marques
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Araujo
Player
Abhinav Sanjeev Shanmugam
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Araujo
Player
Luc Fomba
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
William Jansen
Player
Pedro Araujo
80%
(
59 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
49 of
64)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Araujo
Player
Jesse Flores
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
56 of
79)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Pedro Araujo
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
40%
(
18 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
50 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
107)
112
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karan Singh
Player
Pedro Araujo
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Araujo
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
10
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Araujo
Player
Niklas Waldner
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chidekh Vs Araujo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
